HARRY POTTER: Warner Bros. Facing Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuit After Alleged Wand-Related Injury

HARRY POTTER: Warner Bros. Facing Multi-Million Dollar Lawsuit After Alleged Wand-Related Injury

Warner Bros. is facing a huge lawsuit after a furious mother claimed one of their replica wands based on the Harry Potter franchise nearly blinded her young son. Find more details on what's happening here!

By JoshWilding - Oct 18, 2023 09:10 AM EST
Filed Under: Harry Potter
Source: TMZ

It was way back in 2011 that the Harry Potter franchise ended, and while we've since had three Fantastic Beasts movies (two of which were not good), the Boy Wizard won't take centre stage again until Max's streaming reboot rolls around. 

Despite his lengthy absence from our screens, Warner Bros. continues to produce and sell a vast array of merchandise based on the characters created by author J.K. Rowling. However, one of those appears to have gotten the studio in trouble. 

According to TMZ, an angry mother is suing the studios after a replica Harry Potter wand allegedly injured her toddler's eye. According to the site, "Jessica Perry says she bought a 'Potter' replica wand with a light-up pen function from a store and gave it to her kids...only for it to end up impaling her 3-year-old's eye."

This is said to have happened when her older son was waving the wand around, only for the "metal writing portion of the pen" to fly off and hit the younger child in the eye.

Tragically, the pen ruptured the child's eyeball, almost blinding him and resulting in at least two rounds of surgery. The mother believes the wand was defective and is arguing that Warner Bros. should have done something about it due to there being at least, er, one online review describing a similar incident. 

The lawsuit goes so far as to claim that the eyedrops the child uses make him scream in agony and that he's been left terrified by having to wear an eyepatch. In fact, it goes on to claim that he needs to protect his retina to the extent that he can no longer play sports or live a normal life. 

All in all, that likely explains why the woman is looking for a whopping $8 million in damages! Here's a closer look at the offending item:

71-VJvr-L6-WL

This lawsuit obviously won't do anything to derail plans for the aforementioned Harry Potter reboot and we're expecting a young trio of newcomers to be cast as Harry, Ron, and Hermoine. Cameo appearances from Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint would be fun, albeit potentially distracting, and the original Boy Wizard recently confirmed he has no interest in showing up on Max!

"My understanding is that they're trying to very much start fresh and I'm sure whoever is making them will want to make their own mark on it and probably not want to have to figure out how to get old Harry to cameo in this somewhere," Radcliffe explained. "So I'm definitely not seeking it out in any way."

"But I do wish them, obviously, all the luck in the world and I'm very excited to have that torch passed. But I don't think it needs me to physically pass it."

Keep checking back here for the latest on Harry Potter

HARRY POTTER: Sharon Horgan, Rachel Weisz, Brett Goldstein & Mark Strong In The Mix For Surprising Roles
Related:

HARRY POTTER: Sharon Horgan, Rachel Weisz, Brett Goldstein & Mark Strong In The Mix For Surprising Roles

HARRY POTTER Creative Team Reveal New Details On Casting, Episode Runtimes, And Expanding On The Books
Recommended For You:

HARRY POTTER Creative Team Reveal New Details On Casting, Episode Runtimes, And Expanding On The Books

DISCLAIMER: As a user generated site and platform, SFFGazette.com is protected under the DMCA (Digital Millenium Copyright Act) and "Safe Harbor" provisions.

This post was submitted by a user who has agreed to our Terms of Service and Community Guidelines. SFFGazette.com will disable users who knowingly commit plagiarism, piracy, trademark or copyright infringement. Please CONTACT US for expeditious removal of copyrighted/trademarked content. CLICK HERE to learn more about our copyright and trademark policies.

Note that SFFGazette.com, and/or the user who contributed this post, may earn commissions or revenue through clicks or purchases made through any third-party links contained within the content above.

Be the first to comment and get the conversation going!

View Recorder